Discussion:
faith or force
(too old to reply)
B.G. Kent
2007-05-18 02:53:45 UTC
Permalink
So what is it? are we supposed to come to God through faith alone? or
through force by submitting to what some others think? Who are you
(meaning the collective you) to say whether someone has enough faith or
the right faith then? Are you higher than them? If you too are in the
parade....how can you see the parade as a separate from you...whole?

If Faith is a genuine God infused feeling..then one should be able to come
through it on their own. Telling someone that they must have faith or they
could die in hell....is not faith then...it is fear.

so which is it?

Bren
b***@juno.com
2007-05-21 00:25:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by B.G. Kent
If Faith is a genuine God infused feeling..then one should be able to come
through it on their own. Telling someone that they must have faith or they
could die in hell....is not faith then...it is fear.
That verse in the song "Amazing Grace" says it well:

"Twas grace that taught my heart to FEAR.... and grace my fear
RELIEVED..."

In other words, all people come first to Christianity out of fear, and
then move on to a more mature Christianity based on LOVE.

Fear-based Christianity is the original, less mature form of the
faith. But it cannot be skipped over, even though we might wish it.
Love-based Christianity is the higher state, but fear-based
Christianity MUST be included as part of the process to true
conversion.

If you try to skip over the fear-based phase, you risk a false
conversion. Fear God first, love God later. That is why it says "the
FEAR of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom." It starts with fear, and
ends with love.

Children both fear (at first) and love (later on) their earthly
parents. Likewise with God.
Post by B.G. Kent
so which is it?
False dichotomy. Fear first, love later. Both are required.
B.G. Kent
2007-05-21 23:13:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by b***@juno.com
Post by B.G. Kent
If Faith is a genuine God infused feeling..then one should be able to come
through it on their own. Telling someone that they must have faith or they
could die in hell....is not faith then...it is fear.
"Twas grace that taught my heart to FEAR.... and grace my fear
RELIEVED..."
In other words, all people come first to Christianity out of fear, and
then move on to a more mature Christianity based on LOVE.
B - Don't agree. I came out of love first. Perfect love casts out all
fear.
Fear is the illusion that God is away from you....I've never had that
belief.


Bren
Matthew Johnson
2007-05-23 04:36:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by B.G. Kent
Post by b***@juno.com
Post by B.G. Kent
If Faith is a genuine God infused feeling..then one should be able to come
through it on their own. Telling someone that they must have faith or they
could die in hell....is not faith then...it is fear.
"Twas grace that taught my heart to FEAR.... and grace my fear
RELIEVED..."
In other words, all people come first to Christianity out of fear, and
then move on to a more mature Christianity based on LOVE.
B - Don't agree. I came out of love first. Perfect love casts out all
fear.
But it is only presumption, Bren, that deceives you into claiming that you ever
had this "perfect love". You did not and you do not.

[snip]
--
-----------------------------
Subducat se sibi ut haereat Deo
Quidquid boni habet tribuat illi a quo factus est
(Sanctus Aurelius Augustinus, Ser. 96)
b***@juno.com
2007-05-23 04:36:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by B.G. Kent
B - Don't agree. I came out of love first. Perfect love casts out all
fear.
Fear is the illusion that God is away from you....I've never had that
belief.
Bren
I'm sorry to tell you this Bren, but you show evidence of a false
conversion. You refuse to submit to theology of the Bible, and
substitute Hindu theology in its place. This is what a false convert
would be expected to do. I hope you don't take offense, but that is
the way I see it.

Of course love "casts out fear." That is exactly what I meant, when I
said that the higher form of Christianity is love-based, and "casts
out" the original fear.

At the risk of over-simplification, the Old Testament teaches us to
fear God, the New Testament teaches us to love God. You need both, you
can't just "skip over" the Old Testament and jump straight to the New
Testament. If you COULD just skip over, God would have simply deleted
the Old Testament. He kept it for some reason, why do you suppose He
did that?
B.G. Kent
2007-05-24 03:31:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by b***@juno.com
Post by B.G. Kent
B - Don't agree. I came out of love first. Perfect love casts out all
fear.
Fear is the illusion that God is away from you....I've never had that
belief.
Bren
I'm sorry to tell you this Bren, but you show evidence of a false
conversion.
B - I've never converted...I've always been with God and Jesus in my heart
from the beginning of my consciousness.




You refuse to submit to theology of the Bible, and
Post by b***@juno.com
substitute Hindu theology in its place.
B - No...I refuse to submit to some things in the Bible and my theology is
not Hinduism for I don't believe in any caste system
nor in many things that Hindus believe in.


This is what a false convert
Post by b***@juno.com
would be expected to do. I hope you don't take offense, but that is
the way I see it.
B - Then that is your subjective "seeing" and not objective truth.
Post by b***@juno.com
Of course love "casts out fear." That is exactly what I meant, when I
said that the higher form of Christianity is love-based, and "casts
out" the original fear.
B - there never needed to be "original fear".
Post by b***@juno.com
At the risk of over-simplification, the Old Testament teaches us to
fear God, the New Testament teaches us to love God. You need both, you
can't just "skip over" the Old Testament and jump straight to the New
Testament. If you COULD just skip over, God would have simply deleted
the Old Testament. He kept it for some reason, why do you suppose He
did that?
B - The Old TEstament is Jewish works...the New is Jewish Christian mixed
with many interps...variations etc. I don't believe one needs "both"
except in a theology study of how beliefs change and morph over time.
God would delete the Old Testament? He kept it for some reason? There are
many books that God could "delete" as you say...but they are
kept.....pornography even.. Why do you suppose that is?

When religions are forced on many..by the point of a sword...one can see
how easily they can stay through the ages. There's no trick involved.

Bren
Matthew Johnson
2007-05-25 01:16:41 UTC
Permalink
In article <DG75i.8647$***@trnddc02>, B.G. Kent says...
[snip]
Post by B.G. Kent
B - The Old TEstament is Jewish works.
Oh, no. It is MUCH more than that. If it really were, as you say, just "Jewish
works", we really would have tossed it just as Marcion did.

But we did NOT. Why? Because when properly understood, the Old Testament _is_
found to be speaking about Christ.

Even if you don't read it this way, the Old Testament contains _many_
indications, especially in Proverbs, that there is much more to God-pleasing
righteousness than "Jewish works". See, for example Pro 20:11 and 24:16.
Post by B.G. Kent
..the New is Jewish Christian mixed
with many interps...variations etc.
This isn't true either. On the contrary: it sounds like you have latched on to
this pet belief as a handy excuse for your own failure to see through the many
falsehoods of your own pet belief system.
Post by B.G. Kent
I don't believe one needs "both"
except in a theology study of how beliefs change and morph over time.
Well, so _what_ if that is what you believe? You have no basis for your belief
other than your own private whim.

[snip]
--
-----------------------------
Subducat se sibi ut haereat Deo
Quidquid boni habet tribuat illi a quo factus est
(Sanctus Aurelius Augustinus, Ser. 96)
l***@hotmail.com
2007-05-21 00:25:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by B.G. Kent
So what is it? are we supposed to come to God through faith alone? or
through force by submitting to what some others think?
No human "force" is involved. Also, you will feel no Divine force
compelling your to hold your hand over the flame. It is a conscious
choice on your part.
Post by B.G. Kent
Who are you
(meaning the collective you) to say whether someone has enough faith or
the right faith then?
Haven't you been listening to what everyone has been saying to you?
Is it that difficult for you to accept? Simply put, you argree with
what we've been saying -that a supreme authoritative is primary.
There can't be a collective, can't be many, can't be even two. "There
can be only one," to quote an old movie line. Right is determined on
what God has revealed to us in His Word, the bible.
Post by B.G. Kent
Are you higher than them? If you too are in the
parade....how can you see the parade as a separate from you...whole?
Again, your presupposition is wrong. No one is judging. However, if
the biblical guidelines are not followed or accepted, then the
discernment is that one has not come to true saving faith.

You purchase something at the store and the teller tells you, "That'll
be five dollars." You don't have to jump through hoops to interpret
that sentence. And so it is with the Gospel call. It is elemental.
It is simple (but not simplistic). It's not that hard and yet there
is something within everyone that thinks it foolish and naturally
reject that calling unless God first capacitates acceptance. All are
dead in their sin/alienation from God. Dead men can do nothing.
Likewise, it requires God to regenerate us before we are recapacitated
to accept Him and His offer of salvation. It is a work of God but
consciously it is a choice of the individual.
Post by B.G. Kent
If Faith is a genuine God infused feeling..then one should be able to come
through it on their own. Telling someone that they must have faith or they
could die in hell....is not faith then...it is fear.
so which is it?
Basically your question is that which has engaged the attention of the
greatest minds of every age. It is perplexing because it is
paradoxical. If God has foreordained whatsoever comes to pass, who
will be effectually called and who will not, the whole series of
events of everyone and everything, then the common conclusion is that
human liberty has been taken away. Men become but passive instruments
in the hand of their Creator. Men can do nothing but what they are
secretly and irresistibly influenced to do. Men are not responsible
for their actions and God is the ultimately the author of sin.

To this the objection is raised that the divine decree is ex-trinsic
to the human mind. It exerts no force or influence upon our faculties
and that while it insures the fruition of the plan, it leaves them to
be accomplished in the existence of our liberty.

Back and forth the arguments are made. However, much of the context
is predicated upon poor definition of terms. For instance, liberty
does not consist in the power of acting or not action but rather in
the ability to act from choice. Choice is determined by something in
the "mind" whether influenced externally or not. The provocation is
not the issue. The choice makes the action free and therefore the
individual accountable. But that which ties or connects the
foreordination of God and human liberty, though real, it remains
invisible and God has chosen not reveal or describe the dynamic to
men. Our responsibility lies in only accepting that revelation which
HE has given.

Faith is always based upon some foundation of knowledge. Faith in
faith is an absurdity. It doesn't exist. You go to work everyday
based upon the knowledge that you will get paid for that labor at the
end of the week which in turn you will be able to take that green
piece of paper and purchase food and pay the rent and buy gas for your
car etc. The entire system is faith based. Everyone lives a "faith"
existence. But it is no different when we come to salvation. The
Christian message is exclussively different than all other methods of
salvation for the Gospel message starts off with the bill already
being remitted. God has paid the price of our freedom. All we have
to do is cash the check -so to speak. We have to accept His offer as
having true substance. We have to accept His offer in but one
effectual way -by faith. And in do so, we turn our backs on the
world's system of living. It is complete devotion to but One Truth.
Of course, we fail at many points in trying to live out this devotion,
but the intital act of sitting down and resting in what has been
accomplished for us by Jesus Christ is a once and for all act. It is
not repeated judicially. For at that moment where we make the choice,
God declares us righteous by imputing the righteousness of Christ to
our account. Thereafter? We must existentially live a life of faith,
drawing upon that account by reliance upon the Spirit to enlighten and
empower us to do the work of God. Simple yes but never simplistic.
Easy? Yes but never without great striving.

One way.
One faith.
One Lord.
shegeek72
2007-05-21 23:13:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by B.G. Kent
So what is it? are we supposed to come to God through faith alone? or
through force by submitting to what some others think? Who are you
(meaning the collective you) to say whether someone has enough faith or
the right faith then? Are you higher than them? If you too are in the
parade....how can you see the parade as a separate from you...whole?
If Faith is a genuine God infused feeling..then one should be able to come
through it on their own. Telling someone that they must have faith or they
could die in hell....is not faith then...it is fear.
so which is it?
I don't know if this is continuation of a thread or a new one, but
I'll toss in my 2 cents.

There were two main things that turned me off to Christianity for a
good portion of my life: proselytization (particularly J.W.s showing
up at my door) and views on homosexuality, and now transsexuality. I
know I sound like a one-trick pony, but time after time, since joining
MCC (Metropolitan Community Church), I've heard of family, friend and
church rejection and condemnation of our gay and lesbian brothers and
sisters that led them to tears and untold suffering, discrimination
and violence. These aren't statistics like 2-3% of the population is
homosexual, or how many took part in a gay pride parade, that some
watch from the comfort of their armchairs, carefully edited to include
the most wild behavior in order to invoke disgust.

These are some of the nicest, most articulate, creative and caring
people I know and how they've been treated as a result of the wide-
spread misinterpretation of homosexuality in the Bible is horrible and
unneeded. They don't want to harm anyone and just live there lives
like anyone else, with the same rights and protections that they're
denied by misguided moralizers.

My spiritual journeys in my 20s, partially because I was turned off to
Christianity, were into Eastern mysticism, meditation and yoga that
led to insight and well-being. Does that mean if, for some unfortunate
event, I died in my 20s I would be denied access to heaven and
banished to hell, as fundamentalists believe?

I also read the Bible. Not for religious reasons, but to find out why
people misinterpret some parts, understand what life was like back
then and to investigate parts that indicate paranormal events.

Even when I heard about the GLBT-friendly MCC, I was still too turned
off to Christianity to attend.

Then one night after I'd read about half of Mark, when I was going
through a period of depression, I took a shower. While bathing I
realized I wasn't depressed and my body, that had been numb, was
tingling with feeling. Ok, there's something to this, I thought.

Several weeks later, another TS friend and I attended MCC's late-
morning service. There was something special in the air as I entered
the church and I sobbed throughout the entire service. When I took
communion I don't remember every word the communion server said, but
it was exactly what I needed to hear.

Since then I've been a regular attendee of MCC, recently became a
member and have been asked to be a communion server.

After attending the first few services, I asked God if there was
anything wrong with being transsexual and bisexual: each time I got a
distinct "No," God loves and accepts everyone as they are without
judgment. Now, after going to services for 8 months I wouldn't think
of hurting anyone, nor animal, wouldn't steal, etc. Besides knowing
they're wrong, my conscience would bother me. It seems odd that
despite being in the house of the Lord for many months my conscience
doesn't bother me about being TS or bi. Lest it slip anyone's mind,
Jesus railed against all manner of things that were wrong, yet said
*nothing* about homosexuality or transgender.

Just as with gay youth, the suicide rate is higher among transgengers.
LGBT people already have to deal with much adversity, rejection and
discrimination, why heap on religious judgment and alienation? LGBT
people threaten no one, except those with issues and/or
misinterpretations of Bible passages.

--Tara
B.G. Kent
2007-05-23 04:36:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by shegeek72
I don't know if this is continuation of a thread or a new one, but
I'll toss in my 2 cents.
B - NO it was a new one.
Post by shegeek72
There were two main things that turned me off to Christianity for a
good portion of my life: proselytization (particularly J.W.s showing
up at my door) and views on homosexuality, and now transsexuality. I
know I sound like a one-trick pony, but time after time, since joining
MCC (Metropolitan Comm
B -Tina...you may come off as a one-trick pony to some but your
experiences have led you to so much learning that said pony is more of a
work horse! May all your experiences continue to make you the wonderful
person that you appear to be (at least to me!)

Blessings
Bren
B.G. Kent
2007-05-23 04:36:28 UTC
Permalink
Oops..sorry about that I meant Tara..not Tina...

Oy...one of those days.

love Bren
Loading...