James
2008-08-12 03:14:39 UTC
Re: Exorcism?
In reading Luke 11:24-26 there are some unexpected words from Jesus.
Apparently sometimes when a demon is exorcised from a person it later
returns to the same person, or even comes back with some demon
friends. This notwithstanding I have often found exorcisms to be kind
of a weak miracle anyways (assuming that a possessed person in the
Bible is somewhat similar to a mentally ill person of today). After
all, even the most far gone of mentally ill people can have brief
lapses of sanity. One might assume a lapse of sanity might take place
when being the focal center of a ritual. Yet demon exorcisms are
commonly referred to by many modern preachers as one of the most
amazing examples of Jesus's healing powers.
But my question is, why didn't Jesus simply forbid the unclean
spirit(s) to return to the person? There doesn't seem to be any
obvious reason why he couldn't do this. Is there any explanation? I
have seen some Catholic Bibles suggest he is referring (in the above
passage) to the 'exorcism of Israel' or something prophetic,
political, and symbolic. But even if this were the case, it would
seem difficult to rule out a literal reading as well. And the literal
reading is that exorcism just plain doesn't work very well.
Sincerely,
Matt
Hello Matt,In reading Luke 11:24-26 there are some unexpected words from Jesus.
Apparently sometimes when a demon is exorcised from a person it later
returns to the same person, or even comes back with some demon
friends. This notwithstanding I have often found exorcisms to be kind
of a weak miracle anyways (assuming that a possessed person in the
Bible is somewhat similar to a mentally ill person of today). After
all, even the most far gone of mentally ill people can have brief
lapses of sanity. One might assume a lapse of sanity might take place
when being the focal center of a ritual. Yet demon exorcisms are
commonly referred to by many modern preachers as one of the most
amazing examples of Jesus's healing powers.
But my question is, why didn't Jesus simply forbid the unclean
spirit(s) to return to the person? There doesn't seem to be any
obvious reason why he couldn't do this. Is there any explanation? I
have seen some Catholic Bibles suggest he is referring (in the above
passage) to the 'exorcism of Israel' or something prophetic,
political, and symbolic. But even if this were the case, it would
seem difficult to rule out a literal reading as well. And the literal
reading is that exorcism just plain doesn't work very well.
Sincerely,
Matt
Based on Lu 11:24-27, apparently if the person has gotten rid of the
demon, it can come back (and bring more) if that person does not fill
that void with things of God etc. Because the disciple James says at
Jas 4:7,
"Submit yourselves, then, to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee
from you." (NIV)
Evidently Jesus was discussing a situation here in Luke, where the
person did not resist the devil and evil spirits, nor fill that void
with strong spiritual things. So the demon came back with his
friends.
I hope this has helped.
Sincerely, James
If you wish to have a discussion with me, please use email since I do
not follow all conversations in ng threads
***********************************
Want a FREE home Bible study?
Have Jehovah's Witnesses Questions?
Go to the authorized source:
http://www.watchtower.org
***********************************