Terence Nesbit
2008-05-26 18:05:04 UTC
Do you doubt that demons walk amongst us? Why is that? Because man is free
to choose? Or do you limit who you say has demons to those that commit
heinous acts? What about those that hate and do everything to stop another
from doing, or that wants to deny peaceful existences? What about those that
want to coerce others to do something in excess of that required in order to
do what they already have proven they are capable of doing? Especially when
that added action is one which is against what God has pointedly said not to
do. Two seperate things, with totally different focuses, are joined
suddenly, but why? Why is it important to base the success in one arena on
the doing of an act that does not relate to the field you are wanting
success in altogether? (This is so even when the body is used for
advancement purposes, although one of those ways are conducive to the
natural union of the male and female.)
Do you think that people can be possessed by demons? Can people be taught
to hate in this day and age without a valid basis to prompt that emotion?
But even when a valid basis may exist, those same people have to ignore the
actions taken by members of their own race against others to not hate them,
even when they are the same, or are similar in nature.
What brought on this topic? The idea of "legion" having personal demons,
but not being possessed by demons. They were put out of the man, and the
demons tried to control the swine that they entered. Or did they? Did the
demons commit suicide solely because they were not allowed to do so in the
man that they were in? In the end they controlled the swine, but no demon
can take on God and win, can they?
Understanding is about faith. Faith is about believing in something no
matter how poorly understood it may be. No matter the questions that may be
asked. Of course, to have faith means that there is faith that an answer
will be given. Not just any answer either, the right answer has to be
given. Then you have to hear the answer. Concommitantly, you can't have
faith when you fail to follow the simple guidelines that have been
previously set out, and that are easily understood. Don't little children
have faith that their parents and role-models will take care of them? Have
faith that they will be given presents? They even have faith that you will
tell them truth! That is what was meant. Come in that frame of mind.
To answer, both exist.
to choose? Or do you limit who you say has demons to those that commit
heinous acts? What about those that hate and do everything to stop another
from doing, or that wants to deny peaceful existences? What about those that
want to coerce others to do something in excess of that required in order to
do what they already have proven they are capable of doing? Especially when
that added action is one which is against what God has pointedly said not to
do. Two seperate things, with totally different focuses, are joined
suddenly, but why? Why is it important to base the success in one arena on
the doing of an act that does not relate to the field you are wanting
success in altogether? (This is so even when the body is used for
advancement purposes, although one of those ways are conducive to the
natural union of the male and female.)
Do you think that people can be possessed by demons? Can people be taught
to hate in this day and age without a valid basis to prompt that emotion?
But even when a valid basis may exist, those same people have to ignore the
actions taken by members of their own race against others to not hate them,
even when they are the same, or are similar in nature.
What brought on this topic? The idea of "legion" having personal demons,
but not being possessed by demons. They were put out of the man, and the
demons tried to control the swine that they entered. Or did they? Did the
demons commit suicide solely because they were not allowed to do so in the
man that they were in? In the end they controlled the swine, but no demon
can take on God and win, can they?
Understanding is about faith. Faith is about believing in something no
matter how poorly understood it may be. No matter the questions that may be
asked. Of course, to have faith means that there is faith that an answer
will be given. Not just any answer either, the right answer has to be
given. Then you have to hear the answer. Concommitantly, you can't have
faith when you fail to follow the simple guidelines that have been
previously set out, and that are easily understood. Don't little children
have faith that their parents and role-models will take care of them? Have
faith that they will be given presents? They even have faith that you will
tell them truth! That is what was meant. Come in that frame of mind.
To answer, both exist.