energies generated

[Timothy Sutter]

""As hydrogen and helium nuclei fuse
some mass is convertend into energy.""


note; "mass is converted in to energy"


this energy is a product -of-


massive interaction.


now, back to the precise conditions at time T = 0


not time T = (0 + x) but, time T = 0


with this in mind, at the very precise 'moment'
that we have any massive object/particle at all,
we are no longer at time T = 0, but,
are now, at time T = (0 + x)


now, let's just say as to how "light"
travelling through a "vacuum"


is not particulary "hot" nor "cold"


that, a "photon", or coalesced blob of photons,
travelling through a "vacuum" need not be said
to be losing any of its energies
to the environment of the "vacuum"


and that what they do carry,
is an oscillating wave pattern


and that this oscillating wave pattern, may be tranfered
to massive objects, which may be present somewhere in the
'non-vacuous' space,


and, that, when and if, some massive object,
interacts with photons, and some oscillating
wave pattern is transferred from the photon
to the material object,


this may be reckoned in such a manner,


which can, now, be decribed as a


"coherent energy transfer"


what does this boil down to?


well, in certain respects, -if- one


contends that, at some time T = 0


there was some immense blob of light,
and -no- massive material objects,


that no 'coherent energy transfer'
would be possible,


and so, "coolness" and "hotness" would be irrelevant terms,


and, as it were, "hot and cold...wear the same suit"


and then...


we still have no trigger,


but we -do- have time T = 0


and so, now, you either have something purposefully
preventing or something purposefully causing
an "anharmonicity"


=within= -this- sort of situation, which sets off


some sort of emanation of a 'stuff' which has properties
such as an interconversion between energy and mass.


where this "anharmonicity" would be, or


could be, reckoned as the appearance of


"constructive and destructive interference patterns"


and that, where there are "constructive patterns"


we experience "solidness" and where there are


"destructive patterns" we experience "empty space."


mind you, the very precise moment that
we have any particulates at all,


we are no longer at time T = 0,


but, at time T = (0 + x)


which is to say this,


-if- one were to contend that at time T = 0


there was some situation that could
be described as "pure light"


first, this "pure light" is -not- what detectors
in the material manifestation are experiencing,
they are experiencing energies generated -by-
massive particle interactions,


and second, this "pure light," has no relevant "anharmonicity",


no "oppositional forcework" is present which can trigger


the emanation of the stuff which interconverts matter/energy,


and so, it is valid to suggest a conscious nudge,


if not more than that.


and so, it is still valid to conclude
some sort of conscious interference,


and this derives a conscious awareness


which "pre-dates" the matter/energy physical manifestation,


which, is not at all such a horrifying notion,


that it must be denounced based on personal bias alone.


it's sort of like PURE LIGHT purposefully brings about


"matter/energy" where "matter/energy" now produces


a sort of Image of PURE LIGHT called


'electromagnetic radiation' where "mass"


is the "filtering prism" or "lens"


"my physical being magnifies YHWH"


feel free to see things differently.


with the PURE LIGHT we have PURE CONCIOUSNESS


actionable awareness


in the =fullness= of PURE LIGHT


there is no empty shadow


some sort of conciousness emulation is present now,


in the physical manifestation, and this consciousness emulation,


-can be- comprehended by the PURE CONSCIOUSNESS


maybe that's a 'revelation' to some


when that PURE CONSCIOUSNESS plants


a finer understanding of Eternity


in to your 'mind'


et cetera...

[Timothy Sutter]

if there is nothing and only nothing

the only possible replica of nothing is nothing,

and, nothing can do nothing and only nothing is.

in order for something to be,

something always is.


what is

the original something

the original indivisible entirety

that which is




activity potential

something can happen

something does something

something happens



if nothing is nothing is done



something that is is something that does


is does



something does something to something



nothing else is

that can do something

to something



is does



is acts on is

is is not acted upon

because nothing else is



how is does is known to is


this is who is is

the one who knows

is is is



something that is is something
that can be doing something


something that is is something that
can be making something happen.


and there is the origin

the beginning

and the end of all regression


The Origin


Is Is


The Primary Source

Is aware




given the nature of this universe,

postulating God is perfectly reasonable.

the material universe is not infinitely old
the material universe has a beginning

unreasonable to assume that the smallest
volume of the universe is finite and non-zero.

zero volume completely removes any
possibility of harmonic oscillation
from matter.

now, show yourself that there
is no tuning fork to -induce-
a vibration in anything
else anywhere.

now, what made the material universe ignite?

no accidental ignition is possible.
no accidental ignition is possible.
no accidental ignition is possible.

there simply is no trigger.

and there is your absolute necessity
for a Creative Personality.

genesis can -not- be an accident.

and that which you can see now,
was brought into being by this
Creative Personality which
you can not see.

otherwise, the material universe
never ignites, it remains static.

The Creator Made the material universe happen.

it's that simple.

this is -reasonable-

and that's all that matters.

it is -reasonable-